Dear HealthForward
Issue 184:
"Vaccine Conspiracy": The First Casualty of War is Truth
Copy,
reproduce and forward freely.
CureZone
Newsletter is sponsored by netatlantic.com
and DrNatura.com
32,552 subscribers ... Subscribe here
All archived newsletters available at: http://curezone.com/forums/s.asp?f=83&ob=d&c=1
You must have heard saying: "The first casualty of war is truth. The second casualty are the innocent."
Does this apply to the "war on diseases"?
Vaccines are the weapon of choice in the war
on many diseases. The unanswered questions are:
What happens with the truth? What happens with the innocent?
In the
previous newsletter I informed you about the documentary airing on Norwegian
TV2 channel.
The documentary (unfortunately only in Norwegian language) is now available on
the web. http://webtv.tv2.no/webtv/?treeId=33
In order to gain the access to TV2 web-TV, you have to sign and pay a
subscription. Subscription costs $5/week or $10/month and is renewed
automatically. If the only reason for subscribing is access to vaccine
documentaries, you are advised to unsubscribe after downloading it, or they
will continue to charge you for as long as you are subscribed.
Images published in this newsletter are courtesy of TV2, NIPH, NRK and Svein Erik Berner.
In this newsletter, I will give you the main highlights from the documentary. Before the documentary, here is a small introduction to the history of vaccination in Norway.
Norwegian Vaccination History Timeline
|
1801 |
Edward Jenner
developed the Cowpox (smallpox) vaccine using cowpox fluid (the name vaccine
is derived from the Latin vacca, cow); his first vaccination occurred on May
14, 1796. (* Oslo,
capital of Norway was named Christiania from 1624-1878, Kristiania from
1878-1924, Oslo from 1924) |
|
1810 |
Smallpox
vaccine was mandatory until 1976. Vaccine is optional today. |
|
1891 |
|
|
1929 |
|
|
|
|
|
1947 |
|
|
1952 |
|
|
1956 |
|
|
1969 |
|
|
1975 |
|
|
1976 |
|
|
1978 |
|
|
1983 |
|
|
1984 |
Last
Norwegian-produced DPT vaccines were used during the 1984/85. |
|
1992 |
|
|
1990s |
Number of asthma cases exploded in Norway. 10% of Norwegian
kids get asthma. Asthma is the #1 most frequent chronic illness in
Norway. Not known if the epidemic has anything to do with vaccination. |
|
1995 |
|
|
2006 |
Introduction of Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine into the
Norwegian childhood vaccination program. Optional today. |
|
|
|
The
Documentary
Document 2, Berner's Child
|
|
Today, Eilert is 25 years old. When he was 3 months old, he
suffered brain inflammation and as a result, permanent brain injury, short
time after receiving DPT shot. |
|
1981, October |
Images of Eilert taken
days before DPT vaccination. |
|
1981, October 29th |
DPT
vaccination |
|
"It was 29th of October 1981, approximately at
1pm. I still remember the nurse and that vaccine. That
little needle changed Eilert's life forever,... and my life. |
|
|
1981, November 1st, 11am |
|
|
|
"I was about to change him when I got that strange scary
cold feeling. It was just as if I knew that something was terribly
wrong with Eilert. When I took him in my hands, his lips were blue, his face
was white and his body was totally lifeless. He was still breathing, but he
was not well." said Gunn Karin Skatvedt, Eilert's mother. Ambulance
took him to the local Baerum Hospital. After the examination at the Baerum
Hospital, Eilert was sent further to The National Hospital in Oslo
(Rikshospitalet). |
|
1981, November 1st |
"When I saw him in that hospital bed, I could not recognize
him. He looked totally lifeless. I said to the nurse: this is not my
grandchild ... where is my grandchild? .... she said yes, that is him,
... and, it may not be as bad as it looks like, she said" said
Gulla Berner, Eilert's grandmother. Eilert was,
for the next 3 weeks, in The National Hospital in Oslo. He suffered
meningitis, an inflammation of the membranes (meninges) covering the brain. |
|
"When we left The National Hospital, we were optimistic,
but we did get the message that Eilert most likely suffered brain damage,
though nobody knew how serious was it that time." "I
contacted The Norwegian Institute for Public Health and got the message
that Eilert did not suffer from vaccine reaction. They haven't
even seen his journal! They knew almost nothing about Eilert, but they
refused to register this as possible vaccine caused injury." |
|
|
"A system for reporting on infectious diseases and on
adverse reactions to vaccines was created 1975. Reporter:
"And what happens then?" Hanne
Nokleby: "Then, they are examined and categorized as serious or less
serious." Reporter:
"What was NIPH doing to follow up on those reports of reactions or
complications?" Hanne
Nokleby: "I have no information about that, cause there is nobody today
who used to work in NIPH during 70s and 80s, who could answer that question. |
|
|
|
Svein Erik Berner encountered resistance when trying to find out
what happened to his son, and why NIPH
didn't record it as an adverse vaccine
reaction. "They
called it Near SIDS (Near Sudden Infant Death Syndrome). I
never heard about it before. They said,
no, we haven't, cause they thought it was not a vaccine reaction, it was
"Near SIDS". "I told
them that they are ignoring conclusions of the doctors who treated
Eilert. Doctors of The National Hospital in Oslo are considered the
most respected neurologists and pediatricians in Norway!" |
|
|
Nobody knew at that time how serious brain injury Eilert
suffered. "When we
left The National Hospital, we were optimistic, but we did get the message
that Eilert most likely suffered brain damage, though nobody knew how serious
was it at that time." "We got
the message that Eilert needs to be stimulated in all possible ways in order
to minimize possible development delays caused by the possible brain
damage." "It is
important to stimulate child with brain damage from early age to minimize the
side effects." "Eilert
needed help for absolutely everything." |
|
|
After a while, questions started pushing forward. Why didn't
NIPH record it as adverse reaction? Why wouldn't
they even consider the possibility that Eilert suffered injury as a result of
a vaccine produced by NIPH? Svein Erik
Berner: "It was almost unbelievable. I received a letter from NIPH
with articles on SIDS, Near SIDS." "I
started researching the questions." "I
figured out that Eilert should be compensated for injuries that he
suffered." Svein Erik
Berner files a Lawsuit against the Norwegian State in order to press them to
acknowledge Eilerts injury and to get the compensation for Eilert. |
|
|
|
|
|
On Flagtvedt, outside of Bergen, lives a family that has similar
experience with NIPH. Today,
Kamille is 22 years old. |
|
1984, August 1st |
Camilla was vaccinated August 1st, 1984. The same evening
she was sick. Just like Eilert, she also suffered brain damage. NIPH
concluded: Camilla was Near SIDS (Near Sudden Infant Death Syndrome). |
|
|
"Camilla was suffering bronchitis, and has received
penicillin. We went to a doctor, and he examined her and said she was now OK.
Then he said that she could receive a vaccine now, so she doesn't need to
come back again to the health station." said Monika Enehaug Yndestad,
mother of Camilla Same evening,
6 hours after the DPT shot, Camilla was found in bed blue in her face, not
breathing. She was rushed to the Haukeland University Hospital in Bergen. Today,
Camilla needs help with anything and everything. She is 22, but she is like s
small child with very strong will. Question on
the possibility that her injury was caused by vaccine popped up early. Camilla's
parents file a Lawsuit against the Norwegian State. They loose on
the first two court instances. After
appeals, the highest court takes the case. State lawyers did not want the
case tried at the highest court. After a court
battle that lasted 12 years, state lawyers offer settlement outside the
court. State covers all court expenses, and compensates Camilla for
injuries. Exact amount of the compensation is kept secret.
Newspaper articles reporting the case were entitled: Large compensation
after 12 years of court battle. |
|
Svein Erik Berner also lost the case against the Norwegian State
on the first instance of the court. He was not sure if he wanted to
appeal. He already invested one year of his life into the first trial. "I felt
strongly that authorities were hiding information, suppressing information
and they were also coming forward with clearly wrong information and that has
really made me mad" said Svein Erik Berner, Sten Eilert's father. |
|
|
|
Svein Erik Berner appeals, and searches for help from
internationally recognized experts. |
|
|
One of them is is a physician and a professor in genetics Hans
Krokan, Professor at NTNU ( Trondheim University), Norway. Dr. Hans
Krokan leads a large group of experts in one of the most advanced medical
projects. "I believe
it is highly probable that there is a connection between the vaccine and
the injuries, but you can not be 100% sure. It is impossible to be 100%
sure." "When
you are vaccinating with a whole cell vaccine, child will be exposed to all
components, proteins of the Pertussis bacteria. If those
components are not fully inactivated, it could cause serious complications
and reactions inside brain. It has been
shown in experiments with mice. It has been demonstrated in animal
models that there are several components in Pertussis bacteria that could
develop serious reactions inside brain. It is the animal model that has made
it possible to create a diagram of the mechanism that leads to brain
injury." said Dr. Hans Krokan. |
|
|
Dr. Hans Krokan is not the only one holding the opinion. There
are dozens of experts, physicians, who support Berner in court. From his
office in Los Angeles, Dr. John H. Menkes, one of the worlds leading
experts on vaccine injuries supports Berner. He said: "I would
be glad to come to Oslo to testify as expert witness". Dr. John H.
Menkes have examined Eilerts journal. Dr. Menkes is pediatrician specialized
in pediatric neurology. He has written text books, some of which
are part of the Medical curriculum all over the world, including Norway. His
name is well known and respected. When it comes
to Eilerts brain injury, Dr. Menkes is clear: Eilert's
brain has marks since inflammation. Marks where it was suppose to be brain
tissue. Dr. Menkes
has seen similar marks on other children that suffered vaccine injury.
The society must admit that injuries are happening, and must take the
responsibility. Who is
right? NIPH or Dr. Menkes? The Health
authorities of other countries have concluded: Brain injuries after DPT are
rare but it happens. It is the Pertussis component that is responsible. Several
countries have discontinued vaccinating with whole cell DPT after numerous
injuries, including Sweden and France. |
|
|
"After the examination of the whole case, it is my opinion
that Pertussis component is not responsible for brain injury." said
Hanne Nokleby, Director of the Vaccine Division at The Norwegian Institute
for Public Health. Hanne Nokleby
(NIPH):
"After the total evaluation one must conclude that Pertussis component
is not the most likely explanation for the brain injury." Reporter:
"So, one has to chose what to believe?" Hanne
Nokleby: "Or one should look at what the most likely explanation is ...
and I believe that main weight pushes against the idea that there is a link
between Pertussis vaccine and injuries." Hanne
Nokleby: "But, even if the main weight is against the idea that there is
a link between Pertussis vaccine, one can not absolutely eliminate that
possibility. In a single example, it is impossible to state: Yes, this is for
sure Pertussis injury ... or this is for sure NOT Pertussis injury. In
a single example, it is impossible to prove that it was not vaccine ... but
one can say something about the probability of something like that
happening." |
|
|
One that fills the syringe must trust and believe that the
content will not cause injury. NIPH had
responsibility for production, vaccination and for recording and evaluating
the adverse events. In Norway, we
have a saying for this: "to set the fox to keep the geese."
("å sette bukken til aa passe havresekken"). |
|
|
During the 80's, all unwanted effects of vaccines were
classified in 2 major groups: Side effects and complications. The most
serious conditions were called complications. Side effects: 1980: 223 These were:
allergic reactions, high fever, shock after the injection and cry ... all
considered side effects. Complications
are reports of more serious events. Eilert's brain inflammation would be one
of those. It should have been recorded as a possible vaccine related
complication, but NIPH refused to record it as adverse event, even it was
against the law. There were
127 complications recorded during the 80's. |
|
1982 |
SIDS |
|
|
Another number was extremely high during the 80s. It was the
number of children who's death was labeled SIDS (Sudden
Infant Death Syndrome). SIDS is a
label given when an infant dies of unknown cause. Child usually dies while
sleeping, without an apparent cause. Alarmingly
large number of SIDS cases were reported in Oslo from 1979 to 1982, all
occurring during the first few weeks after DPT shot. Were those
cases related to vaccines? 1982, Dr. Jens Steen and sociologist Leif Kåre
Solberg from Oslo Oslo Board of Public Heath delivered a report to Health
Minister and to NIPH about possible link between DPT vaccine and
SIDS in Oslo. Report examined SIDS cases from 1/1/1979 until 1/7/1982. Dr. Jens Steen was chief physician of the Mother
and Child department at Oslo Board of Public Heath and had medical
responsibility for all Health stations in Olso. Leif Kåre Solberg was
chief of the Clearing department at Oslo Board of Public Heath. This report was
stamped "Top Secret" and was shared with not more then 5 people.
They did not want to cause panic before they have more data. The research
examined 14,000 vaccinated kids. 15 of them died after
receiving DPT vaccine produced by NIPH. 12 of 15 died
within 4 weeks, while 7 of 15 died within 7 days after receiving DPT. These numbers
were alarming. At the meeting decision was made to produce a second report
covering longer period of time and covering whole Norway. Leif Kåre Solberg produced the second report. The second
report did not find a link between DPT and SIDS. This report was also stamped
"Top Secret". Here are the
results of SIDS analysis from 2004: The diagram
shows that most deaths occurred during the second month, which is before the
DPT shot. DPT was given at 3 months of age. There is no visible peek on
the diagram at 3 months of age. If DPT was linked to SIDS, one would
expect to see a peek at 3 months of age. The problem
with this research is that it has not taken into account a possibility that
only vaccines used in Oslo were problematic or that only vaccine given during
a 2 years period were the hot batch. If only
vaccines delivered to Oslo had problems, then Oslo statistics would have been
overshadowed by numbers from the whole country, and by addition of numbers
from other years. |
|
|
Through the
studies of medicine and Norwegian vaccination history Svein Erik Berner have
discovered important documents, documents nobody new existed. Here is one of
them. Vaccine
statistics from the NIPH are not recorded by the The Norwegian Medicines Agency (NoMA). (NoMA is the national, regulatory authority for new and
existing medicines.) Further
research into the problem brings several documents. Already 1981, NoMA sent a letter to NIPH
(SIFF) reminding them that all adverse reactions, including serious
complications, are to be reported to NoMA (SLK). But, that did
not happen. When health
teams were vaccinating kids, they were obliged by law to report serious adverse
reactions to NIPH (SIFF). But, NIPH
who received the reports, ignored those reports and did not report further to
NoMA (SLK). The result of this was that NIPH
"made invisible" hundreds of complications reported by doctors from
all over the country. NIPH
also excluded possible serious injures from all statistics by labeling them
and calling them the Near SIDS. During the
period from the 1978 to 1985 NIPH
registered 127 serious complications and several hundreds of less serious
adverse reactions after DPT. During the
same 8 years period, NoMA (SLK) registered only 4 complications.
Registering
failed. System failed. |
|
|
Cause they
shouldn't produce damage, ..... they feel they don't." |
End
of Part I
The second part of this documentary is
available on CureZone website:
http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=781377#i